"While Globe-Intel remains a free service to
all subscribers, all the material published is copyright and cannot
be reproduced without the prior permission of Globe-Intel. All this
material is first published in a group of international newspapers whose
support helps to defray the costs of producing the stories."
BRITAIN'S ISLAND IN THE SUN
BECOMES BLAIR'S LATEST PROBLEM
IN TORTURE SCANDAL
by
Gordon Thomas
Tony Blair will face further embarrassing questions over the torture
scandal as to why the government permitted the CIA and the US Department
of Defence to operate a top-secret interrogation centre on Diego Garcia,
a tiny and remote British Crown colony in the Indian Ocean.
High level leaders and operatives of al Qaeda and the Taliban are held
there. None are protected by the Geneva Convention. Last week, FBI director
Robert Mueller said the interrogation techniques used by the CIA interrogators
"violate all American anti-torture laws and would be prohibited
in criminal cases of the most serious kind".
The interrogation techniques used on Diego Garcia are contained in a
secret CIA manual on coercive questioning. It contains sections headed
"Threats and Fear", "Pain", "Narcosis"
and "Heightened Suggestibility and Hypnosis".
The presence of the prisoners on Diego Garcia is so secret that a counter-terrorism
official in Washington said President Bush "had informed the CIA
he did not want to know where they were".
The American interrogators have unfettered access to prisoners kept
on board prison ships in the island's deep-water harbours. They are
brought ashore for questioning in a custom-built concrete cell-block
near the island's air field. From there, US Air Force B52s took off
to bomb Afghanistan and then Iraq.
Now private Lear jets regularly fly in with new prisoners. Highly placed
intelligence sources in Pakistan and Washington have revealed that over
thirty al Qaeda suspects have been kidnapped by CIA snatch squads and
flown to Diego Garcia in the chartered Lears.
Among them are Osama bin Laden's senior lieutenants, Khalid Sheik Mohammed
Ramzi Binasshibh and Abu Zubaida, kidnapped from Pakistan.
One intelligence source said: "These operations are sanctioned
in Washington from the top. Rumsfeld knows. Sometimes the snatch flights
are approved by the White House".
Alberto Gonzales, President Bush's in-house counsel, confirmed that
"many key decisions about detainees and their status are made by
the President".
Last week, Amnesty International wrote to William S Farish, the US ambassador
to Britain, to seek a meeting over claims that "stress and duress
tactics" are being used on Diego Garcia prisoners. And he wanted
to know the role of "various foreign intelligence services known
to torture detainees who are also involved in the interrogations".
Both MI6 and Mossad agents are known to have visited Diego Garcia to
question "high value" suspected terrorists.
Both Amnesty and the International Red Cross have been refused permission
to visit the island under a secret deal made between London and Washington.
Secret legal opinions from US Justice Department and Pentagon lawyers
have concluded that the CIA was "safe from scrutiny" if it
conducted its interrogations on places like Diego Garcia.
It is not known if those opinions were known to the UK government when
the use of Diego Garcia as an interrogation centre was decided upon.
A key ruling states violations of American statutes that prohibit torture,
degrading treatment or the Geneva Convention will not apply "if
it can be argued that the detainees are formally in the custody of another
country".
"As Diego Garcia is a British colony, it could mean that the prisoners
there are entitled to British protection", said a counter-terrorism
officer in Washington. He is one of those who has expressed concerns
inside the CIA over what is happening.
"If the Administration has nothing to hide, it should immediately
end incommunicado detention and grant access to independent human rights
organisations", sad Irene Khan, Secretary General of Amnesty International.
Human rights organisations fear that there are similar physical abuses
at Diego Garcia as were revealed in Baghdad's now notorious Abu Ghrain
prison.
Since February 1964 - following a still secret Anglo-American conference
in London - Diego Garcia has increasingly become what Washington calls
"a staging base for the security of the West".
Hundreds of islanders, all British passport holders - who a Foreign
Office official noted in 1955 "are lavish with their Union Jacks"
- were thrown off Diego Garcia at short notice. But the coral limestone
island is still one of the British Indian Ocean Territories.
There are now 6,000 US military personnel living on the island - along
with their "high value" al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners.
They are part of more than 9,000 other detainees who are held in US
military controlled prisons specially set up for the purpose.
It has been established that 300 detainees are held in railroad box-cars
at Bagram, north of Kabul. Hundreds more are detained in prisons in
Afghanistan. But the majority are held in Iraq's thirteen jails.
Only what the CIA manual denotes as "the most difficult" are
sent to Diego Garcia. The island was described as "one of the sites
in friendly countries around the world where al Qaeda operatives can
be kept quietly and securely", said a Washington intelligence officer.
The number of detainees on Diego Garcia are not known. But a senior
intelligence officer said that "there are no more than several
hundred held there. Many have been on Diego Garcia for over two years.
Unlike the majority of detainees in Camp X-Ray in Guantanamo Bay, these
prisoners still have important information to give. Diego Garcia has
been designed as the place where that information can be obtained".
One of those believed to be held there is Abu Zubaida, a senior member
of al Qaeda. He was captured by Pakistani intelligence officers and
handed over to the CIA. Hours later he was on Diego Garcia.
On November 3, 2000, the Foreign Office issued a new Immigration Ordinance
order that ensured Diego Garcia island would remain "as secret
a place as can be found on the planet", according to a US official.
Though the island has the same status as the Falkland Islands, no outsider
is allowed to set foot on its soil. The islanders now live on Mauritius,
1,000 miles to the south, most existing in shanty towns near the harbours.
To ensure they have no "right of return", the 2000 edict states
that "nothing must place at risk vital military operations conducted
on and from Diego Garcia".
A clue to those operations is evident by the skyline of satellite towers,
space-tracking domes, oil and fuel dumps and the armada of military
ships in the harbour.
There is a growing concern among human rights organisations that the
"high value" prisoners are being interrogated under guidelines
also approved by US General Geoffrey Miller, the former commander at
Camp X-Ray in Guantanamo Bay. He is now in charge of Abu Gharib prison
in Baghdad.
Shortly after the legal opinions were given on how the CIA could interrogate,
Miller was sent to Baghdad last August by the chairman of the US Joint
Chiefs of Staff, General Richard Myers to "recommend changes that
would improve strategic interrogation".
Miller concluded that "detention operations must act as an enabler
for interrogations".
After that order was implemented, the abuses which have horrified the
world began. Will more abuses emerge from Britain's island in the sun?
ends
IMPORTANT
: Globe-Intel received a lot of replies to the last mailing indicating
that a large number of subscribers on the list are infected with the
"Mydoom" virus. Please ensure you have your virus protection
software installed correctly and fully updated. If you do not use anti-virus
measures please install suitable soft as soon as possible. VisitBlackICE
PC Protection for more info. Click here for more details.
All material published on Globe-Intel is protected not only by
existing copyright laws, but also by laws applying to the infringement
of material specifically published on the Internet. Further, lawyers
acting for Globe-Intel and the newspapers who carry its reports will
seek full legal remedies for any infringement of the copyright. Permission
to republish must be negotiated in writing. Further, any attempt to
pass off original material by rewriting what is clearly prime source
material will be vigorously prosecuted.